The Hire Sense » 2006 » June

Archive for June, 2006

More About Hiring Experience

Our latest article is finished and has been submitted for editorial review. Look for it early next week – can it really be that the Fourth of July is just over a week away?

I was reviewing some of our previous articles and came across these paragraphs from Retooling the Hiring Process for Today’s Market:

One key to properly retooling will shift the current focus from experience to talent. This fundamental change will be precipitated by the need to develop talent as opposed to hiring experience. The experienced candidate will become a product of a supply and demand marketplace. There will be more demand with less supply which leads to increased wages. The highly successful, extremely experienced candidate will be able to take a free agent approach to their job search. They will be able to select from multiple offers and leverage the best overall package.

There is nothing new in this market-driven scenario except for one item. The supply will be greatly diminished which will put incredible pressures on the compensation packages. However, companies will have an alternative to the bidding war €“ hire for talent and develop for strength.

Interview Questions That Numb the Mind

100 Potential Interview Questions. Nothing we like more than a list here at The Hire Sense. Some of the questions from monster.com are utterly inane. I give you number 96:

With your eyes closed, tell me step-by-step how to tie my shoes.

I’m not kidding. Some I wouldn’t know what a good answer would entail if I were asking the question. For example, number 40:

If you were an animal, which one would you want to be?

I shouldn’t be too harsh since there are some good ones also in the list like number 27:

Tell me about a time where you had to deal with conflict on the job.

That’s a good starter question that will require the interviewer to drill down on the candidate’s first response to get to the clear truth. Here is more technique on drilling down, in case you were wondering.

Ghost Written Sales Resumes

Direct from an online posting at a job board:

The job search is a sales and marketing endeavor. YOU are the product, YOU are the salesperson and YOU must define your customers and promote yourself to them via a powerful, focused resume. If you’re able to do that on your own, great! If not, let us help.

Can’t stress it enough – make sure you read all resumes with a huge grain of salt.

Hiring Experience

I’m putting the finishing touches on an article we are going to release next week that deals with hiring salespeople based on experience vs. talent. We advocate sales talent first. A couple of points to whet your appetite:

First, the vast majority of resumes are embellished. We have written about that topic at length. Here’s the rub, if you hire based on experience, I guarantee you are drawing inferences from their embellished resume. You will never truly know the scope of their experience since you cannot reconstruct every aspect of their previous positions. When you interview the candidate, they are going to put as much positive spin on their experience as possible. So you have, at best, a slightly embellished document (don’t know which parts are embellished and which are accurate) which is being undergirded by the author’s overly positive commentary. This approach reeks of trouble.

Second, no two companies compete in the market in the exact same manner. What I mean is that one company’s value proposition is far different than a competitor’s (not talking about price here). The sales skills needed for one company can be far different than another company.

An example: we had a customer who had been hiring based almost exclusively on experience before working with us. They openly discussed this situation. Before becoming our customer, they were able to hire a salesperson from the largest competitor in their industry (at great expense). Our customer’s company was a small, relatively unknown player in that industry. They were ecstatic to land this salesperson and figured he would deliver huge deals for them.

He flopped and was eventually let go. Although he had tremendous industry experience, he lacked the sales skills necessary to sell our customer’s value. First off, the salesperson was not able to prospect. His previous role with the market leader made appointment setting almost automatic. Since our customer was not well known, he had great difficulty securing even marginal prospect visits.

You can guess what the next problem was – he lacked the ability to qualify needs. The market leader actively marketed their value proposition throughout the industry. Our customer relied upon their salespeople to sort out the serious prospects from the tirekickers who were looking for data to plug into their buying spreadsheet. This salesperson was used to selling from a dominant market position so his idea of qualifying was fine wine and country club golf.

Sales process and qualifying are just two points that will be in the upcoming article. I know many of you are thinking that your complex sale requires industry experience. I suspect you have many people within your company who can teach the intricacies to your new salesperson. How many people do you have in your company who can teach them how to effectively sell?

Niche Employment Sites

Sourcing will become the most difficult task in hiring within the next 5 years if it isn’t already. CareerJournal has an informational article today – Niche Sites Catch On With More Job Seekers.

The article basically tracks a handful of higher level employees and their use of niche boards to land their new positions. We have seen a distinct migration to the niche sites and have had success ourselves with them. Dice.com is particularly effective for finding technical talent.

The stat that caught my eye in the article:

Specialized boards today make up some 70% of the roughly 40,000 job sites on the Web, compared with 50% or 55% of the sites in 2001, says Peter Weddle, editor and publisher of Weddle’s Guides, of Stamford, Conn., a series of printed and online guides to Internet job sites.

The major boards are still the de facto standard for resume searches due to the sheer volume of resumes they contain. We typically post positions on one of the major boards and one of the niche boards for any position. This pattern seems to ensure a high quality response rate to the ad.

High D Behavior

A strange story from here in Minnesota is the founder and CEO of Lifetime Fitness. The CEO has had numerous encounters with the local authorities including his latest incident – allegedly harassing a teenager at a local high school parking lot after a driving incident.

I bring this up simply for the fact that I would guess this CEO fits a specific selling style – a very high Dominance factor and a very low compliance factor. This style leads to a rebellious, quick-tempered person. This CEO takes that style to an extreme.

We have a customer who once employed a salesperson with this type of style (we assessed him). He was their top salesperson, but he infuriated as many prospects as he closed. His behavior eventually overwhelmed the internal team – to the point where he used the F-bomb on the CEO. His employment ended and the company has continued to flourish.

My point here is that the extremely high D selling style is the most dangerous style for effective selling . . . and apparently CEOs.

How Not to Stand Out

From a generic cover letter of a person who claims to be a “walking think tank”:

I currently have a job, which pays well, but does not allow me to allow my creativity to flourish. So here, I pose an offer. If you represent a company that can recognize an innovative mind with unlimited potential for improving your company, please contact me immediately.

An interesting approach that makes them stand out. Unfortunately, it does so by sounding quite arrogant. “…unlimited potential for improving your company” speaks in what I term the infinitive condescension. My immediate suspicion is that this person is more concerned about meeting their own needs as opposed to the company’s needs.

One word: assessment.

Marketing to Baby-Boomers

Let’s continue with the marketing-themed Tuesday posts. We have discussed Gen X & Y on this blog and we have published articles on how to hire them.

Marketingprofs.com pens an article today – A Holistic Approach to Marketing to Baby Boomers – that looks at the largest generational group. Seems silly now, but we have conveniently ignored the boomers in our posts. Let me give you one reason why we shouldn’t ignore them:

An American turns 50 every seven seconds.

Staggering. I am intrigued by this point from the article:

Although boomers are veering away from rocking chairs, research shows the desire for achieving a balanced life as they age. As a result, the definition of work is changing as boomers start to move toward traditional retirement ages in their careers. Trends show that new, part-time, and modified careers are all on the table along with the need for continuous skill refinement and new learning.

That commentary could be made of the X and Y generations and their striving for work-life balance. Interesting how the Baby Boomers, long considered a workaholic generation, are now striving for a similar goal.

Productivity improvements alone will not be able to replace the boomers in the workplace. In the very near future, this older generation will need to be an option for many companies looking to fill open positions.

Updated Home Page

Today we have completed some minor updates to our home page. Our goal is to make the page easier to navigate, offer a complimentary assessment and provide a news section for general announcements.

We will have more updates and releases coming soon. And thanks to Matthew Mills at Piperdown Studio for his ongoing expertise in developing our relatively new website design.

Handling Leads

Since our topic du jour seems to be lead generation, here is a very quick read from Sales&Marketing Magazine about how to handle leads once you receive them. Nothing revolutionary in the approach, but the author’s point is accurate – salespeople prefer to work only hot leads and ignore the warm to cool ones.

The best sales management approach we have seen is to categorize the leads. That can be A, B or C or some other manner. The frequency of contact and focus of time needs to be defined for each level of lead. The A leads are obviously the priority, B is second and C is last. Simple, I know, but you would be surprised how few companies categorize their leads.

Oh, and a sales manager threatening to shut off the leads to a salesperson until they work the ones they have…very motivating for the salesperson.

Not that I know from personal experience.

« Previous PageNext Page »